April 30,
2013
RAsheda
Young
301 West
Sylvania Ave, Apt 349B
Neptune
City, New Jersey 07753
Susan
Bernstein
29 Castle Pl
New
Rochelle, NY 10805
Good
afternoon Susan:
Thank you so
much for visiting our graduate class Basic Writing Theory and Pedagogy,
Tuesday, April 16th. I enjoyed learning of the guiding principles you
used to compile the book Teaching Developmental Writers 4th Edition.
It is evident from the essays you've selected that diversity of scholarship is
crucial to student success. Honestly, reading diverse scholarship is
crucial to my success as a learner, and I appreciate the various essays from
minority writers.
Even though
I enjoyed your presentation to our class, what I enjoyed most is our
interview. I learned a lot about labels and what labels suggest both to
the student and for the person who uses them. Since I've been a writing
center tutor and adjunct instructor of Basic Writing for ten years, I thought I
was a solid teacher. Wrong. From our discussion, I learned that
referring to students as basic writers identifies them as less than and
marginalizes the learner. Implications of a "basic writer" do
not carry the same implications of a "honor student." What
then I wonder should we call them? Students? While I suspect that
only referring to them as students isn't as injurious to their self-image as
"basic", how then should we categorize or define students' lack of
current ability to produce basic prose that include a main point, significant
development and clear organization?
One of the
essays in your book by Mina Shaughnessy, “Some Needed Research on Writing,”
helped give me a better understanding of underprepared students and the
challenges many basic writing instructors face in the classroom. Shaughnessy asks four crucial questions that
teachers/scholars still need to research. The essay also presents
problems that underprepared writers have in class.
I enjoyed reading this essay as it raises crucial questions for
scholars to research and then answer. It also helped me
better understand students enrolled in these basic writing classes. After our interview
ended, I realized that our conversation extends the scholarship of Mina
Shaughnessy by suggesting that both teachers and students move beyond the basic
label.
Thank you so
much for your visit. I learned a lot. I've included a portion of
our interview. This clip
is the beginning of our conversation about labels. As I grow as a
scholar, I look forward to braiding both your desire to remove the basic writer
label and to extend the scholarship of Mina Shaughnessy as I search to find the
“appropriate” title for students enrolled in Basic Writing classes. Thank
you for helping me rethink how labels either liberate and/or confine the
learner.
Sincerely,
RAsheda
Young
Sincerely,
RAsheda Young
RAsheda,you bring up interesting points about Basic Writing, how the label "a basic writer" can "confine the learner." As you said, we need to find substitutes for the term "basic writers." It is important not to offend our students. Therefore, we should be careful with the words we use to address them.
ReplyDeleteRasheda, You raise a really important question: what is the difference between referring to people as "basic writers" and referring to people as "people enrolled in basic writing courses"?
ReplyDeleteSo what is the answer?
I love the video that you inserted in your blog. Would there be any way for you to share this video with Susan? So you want to invite her to your blog? Or could you email her the video with your letter? It would be nice for her to see the video.
I wish it had been longer so we could hear Susan's response to the question you posed.
Barbara